Technology and Beyond (TaB)

I don't have time to read the details. It is great that you guys discuss and proceed to make a design.

@xwcwt,

I think the headpost is a bit old, it sames the meaning of SFC currently is a Cluster and I am not quite sure if the batch number is still in use.

(10-25-2017 03:23 PM)rayluk Wrote: [ -> ]@xwcwt,

I think the headpost is a bit old, it sames the meaning of SFC currently is a Cluster and I am not quite sure if the batch number is still in use.

I think yes. then how about we assign SFB to replace SFC to indicate current meaning and add "SFC: means a cluster xxx'? @rayluk.

(10-25-2017 03:37 PM)xwcwt Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-25-2017 03:23 PM)rayluk Wrote: [ -> ]@xwcwt,

I think the headpost is a bit old, it sames the meaning of SFC currently is a Cluster and I am not quite sure if the batch number is still in use.

I think yes. then how about we assign SFB to replace SFC to indicate current meaning and add "SFC: means a cluster xxx'? @rayluk.

Good to me. What about the batch number part? Is it still using now?

(10-25-2017 07:58 PM)rayluk Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-25-2017 03:37 PM)xwcwt Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-25-2017 03:23 PM)rayluk Wrote: [ -> ]@xwcwt,

I think the headpost is a bit old, it sames the meaning of SFC currently is a Cluster and I am not quite sure if the batch number is still in use.

I think yes. then how about we assign SFB to replace SFC to indicate current meaning and add "SFC: means a cluster xxx'? @rayluk.

Good to me. What about the batch number part? Is it still using now?

the batch number is still used here.

I think this thread is nodelist user‘s info about how to create ID. Can I move this thread to Technology and Beyond (TaB) / Research / Parts / Nodelist ? And also ,can I move http://tab.d-thinker.org/showthread.php?tid=4593 to Technology and Beyond (TaB) / Research / Parts / Nodelist ?
@xwcwt.

(10-27-2017 11:33 AM)User_Yang Wrote: [ -> ]I think this thread is nodelist user‘s info about how to create ID. Can I move this thread to Technology and Beyond (TaB) / Research / Parts / Nodelist ?

I suggest you keep this thread here and in nodelist user info, add this link into that thread.

Quote:And also ,can I move http://tab.d-thinker.org/showthread.php?tid=4593 to Technology and Beyond (TaB) / Research / Parts / Nodelist ?
@xwcwt.

Good to me.

(11-04-2015 05:28 PM)xwcwt Wrote: [ -> ]This info copy from ZB written by Dr.Li:

The ID of the parts are assign in the following policy:

An ID for example: SFP20100401

由于部件的增多，所以建议进行如下修改：
An ID for example: ((SFP20100401->SFP201004001))

Quote:4. The last 2 digits indicates the part number in the batch.
In case the last 2 digits are not sufficient for a batch with more than 100 parts, you may create new batch number.
Hopefully, we may not issue 100 batches of purchases during one year.

4. The last ((2->3)) digits indicates the part number in the batch.
In case the last ((2->3)) digits are not sufficient for a batch with more than 100((->0)) parts, you may create new batch number.
Hopefully, we may not issue 100 batches of purchases during one year.

RR xwcwt

(07-30-2019 05:00 PM)xgq Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-04-2015 05:28 PM)xwcwt Wrote: [ -> ]This info copy from ZB written by Dr.Li:

The ID of the parts are assign in the following policy:

An ID for example: SFP20100401

由于部件的增多，所以建议进行如下修改：
An ID for example: ((SFP20100401->SFP201004001))

Quote:4. The last 2 digits indicates the part number in the batch.
In case the last 2 digits are not sufficient for a batch with more than 100 parts, you may create new batch number.
Hopefully, we may not issue 100 batches of purchases during one year.

4. The last ((2->3)) digits indicates the part number in the batch.
In case the last ((2->3)) digits are not sufficient for a batch with more than 100((->0)) parts, you may create new batch number.
Hopefully, we may not issue 100 batches of purchases during one year.

RR xwcwt

Good to me.